↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for pityriasis rosea

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for pityriasis rosea
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005068.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose Contreras-Ruiz, Sandra Peternel, Carlos Jiménez Gutiérrez, Ivana Culav-Koscak, Ludovic Reveiz, Maria de Lourdes Silbermann-Reynoso

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 119 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 18%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 7 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 36 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 41 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,282,608
of 17,523,006 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,998
of 11,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,197
of 335,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,523,006 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.