| Title |
Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011116.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Prashanti Eachempati, Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj, Salian Kiran Kumar Krishanappa, Renjith P George, Htoo Htoo Kyaw Soe, Laxminarayan Karanth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 18% |
| Saudi Arabia | 6 | 15% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 5% |
| Ireland | 2 | 5% |
| Chile | 2 | 5% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 3% |
| Cuba | 1 | 3% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 30% |
| Scientists | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 317 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 10% |
| Researcher | 26 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 23 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 55 | 17% |
| Unknown | 131 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 23 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 7% |
| Psychology | 18 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Unknown | 142 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,055,440
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,134
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,791
of 375,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.