↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Standard (head‐down tilt) versus modified (without head‐down tilt) postural drainage in infants and young children with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
Title
Standard (head‐down tilt) versus modified (without head‐down tilt) postural drainage in infants and young children with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010297.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana A Freitas, Gabriela SS Chaves, Thayla A Santino, Cibele TD Ribeiro, Fernando AL Dias, Ricardo O Guerra, Karla MPP Mendonça

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 192 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 5%
Other 7 4%
Researcher 6 3%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 92 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 15%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Unspecified 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 99 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2021.
All research outputs
#16,284,391
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,222
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,212
of 349,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#192
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.