↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Grommets (ventilation tubes) for recurrent acute otitis media in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Grommets (ventilation tubes) for recurrent acute otitis media in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004741.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Loretta Lau, Paul Mick, Desmond A Nunez

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Other 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Professor 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 20 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 20 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2018.
All research outputs
#10,958,020
of 13,793,900 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,772
of 10,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,265
of 200,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,793,900 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.