↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
194 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006560.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Smith, Susan M, Soubhi, Hassan, Fortin, Martin, Hudon, Catherine, O'Dowd, Tom, Susan M Smith, Hassan Soubhi, Martin Fortin, Catherine Hudon, Tom O'Dowd

Abstract

Many people with chronic disease have more than one chronic condition, which is referred to as multimorbidity. While this is not a new phenomenon, there is greater recognition of its impact and the importance of improving outcomes for individuals affected. Research in the area to date has focused mainly on descriptive epidemiology and impact assessment. There has been limited exploration of the effectiveness of interventions for multimorbidity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
United States 5 1%
Spain 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 330 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 81 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 14%
Student > Master 36 10%
Student > Bachelor 26 7%
Student > Postgraduate 25 7%
Other 90 25%
Unknown 51 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 157 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 11%
Psychology 29 8%
Social Sciences 23 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 39 11%
Unknown 63 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,447,683
of 24,618,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,210
of 12,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,834
of 165,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,618,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.