The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Saline irrigation for chronic rhinosinusitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011995.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lee Yee Chong, Karen Head, Claire Hopkins, Carl Philpott, Simon Glew, Glenis Scadding, Martin J Burton, Anne GM Schilder |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 7% |
| Mexico | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 85% |
| Scientists | 3 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 307 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 14% |
| Researcher | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 16% |
| Unknown | 101 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 112 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 9% |
| Unknown | 114 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#550,141
of 26,548,096 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#906
of 13,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,560
of 314,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,548,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.