↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Biomarkers for diagnosis of Wilson's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
Title
Biomarkers for diagnosis of Wilson's disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012267.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aidan Ryan, Sarah J Nevitt, Orla Tuohy, Paul Cook

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 185 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Other 11 6%
Researcher 11 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 91 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Chemistry 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 95 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,566,070
of 26,460,266 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,086
of 13,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,592
of 482,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#136
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,460,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.