↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Biomarkers for diagnosis of Wilson's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Biomarkers for diagnosis of Wilson's disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012267.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aidan Ryan, Sarah J Nevitt, Orla Tuohy, Paul Cook

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Other 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 24 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2019.
All research outputs
#9,387,648
of 17,413,731 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,014
of 11,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,849
of 404,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,413,731 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.