↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Biomarkers for diagnosis of Wilson's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
Biomarkers for diagnosis of Wilson's disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012267.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aidan Ryan, Sarah J Nevitt, Orla Tuohy, Paul Cook

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 157 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Researcher 10 6%
Unspecified 9 6%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 64 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Unspecified 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Chemistry 6 4%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 68 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,744,228
of 23,505,669 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,701
of 12,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,472
of 459,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#135
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,669 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.