↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fluorides for preventing early tooth decay (demineralised lesions) during fixed brace treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
Title
Fluorides for preventing early tooth decay (demineralised lesions) during fixed brace treatment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003809.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip E Benson, Nicola Parkin, Fiona Dyer, Declan T Millett, Peter Germain

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 205 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Student > Postgraduate 19 9%
Researcher 14 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 74 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Psychology 6 3%
Materials Science 3 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 <1%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 72 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2021.
All research outputs
#871,485
of 18,891,791 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,142
of 11,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,957
of 415,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,891,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.