↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions with pregnant women, new mothers and other primary caregivers for preventing early childhood caries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
82 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
Title
Interventions with pregnant women, new mothers and other primary caregivers for preventing early childhood caries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012155.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisha Riggs, Nicky Kilpatrick, Linda Slack-Smith, Barbara Chadwick, Jane Yelland, M S Muthu, Judith C Gomersall

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 237 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 16%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Researcher 21 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 5%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 73 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 12%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Psychology 7 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 80 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2021.
All research outputs
#384,289
of 17,673,294 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#840
of 11,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,668
of 406,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,673,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.