↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009790
Authors

Jill A Hayden, Jenny Cartwright, Maurits W van Tulder, Antti Malmivaara

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 20%
Student > Bachelor 15 17%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 17%
Psychology 4 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 22 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2021.
All research outputs
#5,637,828
of 18,897,820 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,925
of 11,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,184
of 136,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,897,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.