| Title |
Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009629.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cameron Edwin Alexander, Malo MF Scullion, Muhammad Imran Omar, Yuhong Yuan, Charalampos Mamoulakis, James MO N'Dow, Changhao Chen, Thomas BL Lam |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 30% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 30% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 30% |
| Scientists | 6 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 53 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,982,877
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,357
of 12,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,995
of 457,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#77
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.