| Title |
Intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011525.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ekpereonne B Esu, Chioma Oringanje, Martin M Meremikwu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 3 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 6% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 114 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 21% |
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,878,862
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,963
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,251
of 480,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.