↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pressure modification or humidification for improving usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
Title
Pressure modification or humidification for improving usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003531.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barry Kennedy, Toby J Lasserson, Dariusz R Wozniak, Ian Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 146 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 17%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 31 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Psychology 8 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 40 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,938,742
of 17,043,172 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,603
of 11,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,518
of 394,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,043,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.