↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013319.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmed A Kolkailah, Rami Doukky, Marc P Pelletier, Annabelle S Volgman, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Ashraf F Nabhan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 22%
Student > Bachelor 22 22%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 6 6%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 21 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,610,495
of 18,026,194 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,923
of 11,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,981
of 398,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,026,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.