↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
43 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
336 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004916.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey J Walline, Kristina B Lindsley, S Swaroop Vedula, Susan A Cotter, Donald O Mutti, Sueko M Ng, J. Daniel Twelker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 328 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 51 15%
Student > Master 49 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 12%
Researcher 34 10%
Other 25 7%
Other 67 20%
Unknown 71 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 130 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 3%
Psychology 7 2%
Other 51 15%
Unknown 88 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2021.
All research outputs
#583,079
of 19,140,651 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,319
of 11,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,734
of 406,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,140,651 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.