↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
42 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
468 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004916.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey J Walline, Kristina B Lindsley, S Swaroop Vedula, Susan A Cotter, Donald O Mutti, Sueko M Ng, J. Daniel Twelker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 468 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 460 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 63 13%
Student > Bachelor 63 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 10%
Researcher 39 8%
Other 30 6%
Other 89 19%
Unknown 135 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 160 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 3%
Physics and Astronomy 10 2%
Other 64 14%
Unknown 158 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2022.
All research outputs
#714,967
of 23,368,819 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,464
of 12,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,581
of 457,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,368,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.