↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
42 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
595 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004916.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey J Walline, Kristina B Lindsley, S Swaroop Vedula, Susan A Cotter, Donald O Mutti, Sueko M Ng, J Daniel Twelker

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 595 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 587 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 12%
Student > Bachelor 68 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 9%
Researcher 42 7%
Other 38 6%
Other 115 19%
Unknown 209 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 182 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 9%
Unspecified 20 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 3%
Other 72 12%
Unknown 236 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2024.
All research outputs
#902,644
of 26,409,992 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,625
of 13,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,821
of 483,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,409,992 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.