| Title |
Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004916.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeffrey J Walline, Kristina B Lindsley, S Swaroop Vedula, Susan A Cotter, Donald O Mutti, Sueko M Ng, J Daniel Twelker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 26% |
| Spain | 4 | 10% |
| Ireland | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 553 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 545 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 67 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 9% |
| Researcher | 42 | 8% |
| Other | 38 | 7% |
| Other | 104 | 19% |
| Unknown | 181 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 178 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 71 | 13% |
| Unknown | 207 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#867,027
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,665
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,406
of 479,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.