↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor administration for subfertile women undergoing assisted reproduction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor administration for subfertile women undergoing assisted reproduction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013226.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohan S Kamath, Richard Kirubakaran, Sesh Kamal Sunkara

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 162 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 10%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 77 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 85 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,948,438
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,552
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,731
of 476,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.