↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Adenoidectomy for recurrent or chronic nasal symptoms in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Adenoidectomy for recurrent or chronic nasal symptoms in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008282
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maaike TA van den Aardweg, Anne GM Schilder, Ellen Herkert, Chantal WB Boonacker, Maroeska M Rovers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 17%
Researcher 10 11%
Other 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 28 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,606,158
of 23,191,112 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,051
of 12,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,092
of 165,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,191,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.