| Title |
Interventions for ingrowing toenails
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001541.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Just AH Eekhof, Bart Van Wijk, Arie Knuistingh Neven, Johannes C van der Wouden |
| Abstract |
Ingrowing toenails are a common problem in which part of the nail penetrates the skinfold alongside the nail, creating a painful area. Different non-surgical and surgical interventions for ingrowing toenails are available, but there is no consensus about a standard first-choice treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 31% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 263 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 11% |
| Researcher | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 17% |
| Unknown | 73 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 120 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 10% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 82 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,119,330
of 24,810,360 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,542
of 12,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,279
of 166,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,810,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.