↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topical and device-based treatments for fungal infections of the toenails

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
Title
Topical and device-based treatments for fungal infections of the toenails
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012093.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly Foley, Aditya K Gupta, Sarah Versteeg, Rachel Mays, Elmer Villanueva, Denny John

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 165 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 18%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Other 10 6%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 63 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 66 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,941,679
of 24,522,750 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,484
of 12,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,512
of 466,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#103
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,522,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 466,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.