| Title |
Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006282.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Renske I Wadman, W Ludo van der Pol, Wendy Mj Bosboom, Fay-Lynn Asselman, Leonard H van den Berg, Susan T Iannaccone, Alexander Fje Vrancken |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 50% |
| France | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 361 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 12% |
| Researcher | 33 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 52 | 14% |
| Unknown | 158 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 11% |
| Unknown | 166 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,289,636
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,017
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,725
of 476,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.