↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Patient education and counselling for promoting adherence to treatment for tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
494 Mendeley
Title
Patient education and counselling for promoting adherence to treatment for tuberculosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006591.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Machoki M'Imunya, Tamara Kredo, Jimmy Volmink

Abstract

Non-adherence to tuberculosis treatment can lead to prolonged periods of infectiousness, relapse, emergence of drug-resistance, and increased morbidity and mortality. In this review, we assess whether patient education or counselling, or both, promotes adherence to tuberculosis treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 494 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 486 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 88 18%
Researcher 68 14%
Student > Bachelor 51 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 5%
Other 86 17%
Unknown 144 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 157 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 71 14%
Social Sciences 24 5%
Psychology 18 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 3%
Other 52 11%
Unknown 159 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,680,617
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,852
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,231
of 176,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.