↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cephalic version by moxibustion for breech presentation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
52 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Cephalic version by moxibustion for breech presentation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003928.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meaghan E Coyle, Caroline A Smith, Brian Peat

Abstract

Moxibustion (a type of Chinese medicine which involves burning a herb close to the skin) to the acupuncture point Bladder 67 (BL67) (Chinese name Zhiyin), located at the tip of the fifth toe, has been proposed as a way of correcting breech presentation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 222 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 19%
Student > Master 25 11%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 15 7%
Other 42 19%
Unknown 59 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 19%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Psychology 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 67 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#552,511
of 25,459,177 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#978
of 12,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,577
of 176,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,459,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.