↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cephalic version by moxibustion for breech presentation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
32 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Cephalic version by moxibustion for breech presentation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003928.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meaghan E Coyle, Caroline A Smith, Brian Peat

Abstract

Moxibustion (a type of Chinese medicine which involves burning a herb close to the skin) to the acupuncture point Bladder 67 (BL67) (Chinese name Zhiyin), located at the tip of the fifth toe, has been proposed as a way of correcting breech presentation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 225 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 51 22%
Student > Master 34 15%
Researcher 27 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Other 15 7%
Other 45 20%
Unknown 39 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 20%
Psychology 9 4%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 48 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2021.
All research outputs
#406,040
of 17,483,393 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#900
of 11,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,196
of 133,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,483,393 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.