| Title |
Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006543.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth MA van Nispen, Gianni Virgili, Mirke Hoeben, Maaike Langelaan, Jeroen Klevering, Jan EE Keunen, Ger HMB van Rens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 402 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 12% |
| Researcher | 37 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 54 | 13% |
| Unknown | 172 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 49 | 12% |
| Psychology | 22 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 58 | 14% |
| Unknown | 185 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,156,556
of 23,668,780 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,674
of 12,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,010
of 454,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,668,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.