| Title |
Enhanced rehabilitation and care models for adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010569.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Toby O Smith, Anthony W Gilbert, Ashwini Sreekanta, Opinder Sahota, Xavier L Griffin, Jane L Cross, Chris Fox, Sarah E Lamb |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 33 | 48% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 27 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 59% |
| Scientists | 17 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 414 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 413 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 57 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 12% |
| Researcher | 30 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 60 | 14% |
| Unknown | 134 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 57 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 13% |
| Psychology | 12 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 51 | 12% |
| Unknown | 146 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2022.
All research outputs
#683,534
of 24,180,797 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,321
of 12,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,571
of 457,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,180,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.