↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hypotonic vs isotonic saline solutions for intravenous fluid management of acute infections

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Hypotonic vs isotonic saline solutions for intravenous fluid management of acute infections
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004169.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trevor Duke, Asish Mathur, Renata H Kukuruzovic, Michael McGuigan

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Kazakhstan 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 65 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Other 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Unspecified 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 16 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,680,412
of 17,549,474 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,152
of 11,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,818
of 271,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,549,474 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.