↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Laparoscopic ovarian drilling for ovulation induction in women with anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
Title
Laparoscopic ovarian drilling for ovulation induction in women with anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001122.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esmée M Bordewijk, Ka Ying Bonnie Ng, Lidija Rakic, Ben Willem J Mol, Julie Brown, Tineke J Crawford, Madelon van Wely

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 208 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Student > Master 18 9%
Other 17 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Researcher 12 6%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 83 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Unspecified 5 2%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 94 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,512,067
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,940
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,298
of 484,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.