↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Laparoscopic ovarian drilling for ovulation induction in women with anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Laparoscopic ovarian drilling for ovulation induction in women with anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001122.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esmée M Bordewijk, Ka Ying Bonnie Ng, Lidija Rakic, Ben Willem J Mol, Julie Brown, Tineke J Crawford, Madelon van Wely

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 9 8%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 30 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Psychology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 35 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2021.
All research outputs
#5,206,858
of 19,097,846 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,458
of 11,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,337
of 353,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,097,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.