The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometriomata
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004992.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roger J Hart, Martha Hickey, Panos Maouris, William Buckett |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 22% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Kenya | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 263 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 61 | 23% |
| Unknown | 83 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 116 | 44% |
| Psychology | 12 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 98 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,532,772
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,738
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,453
of 92,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.