| Title |
Timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002802.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joan Ostaszkiewicz, Linda Johnston, Brenda Roe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 20% |
| Unknown | 42 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 8% |
| Psychology | 9 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 47 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,743,033
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,725
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,538
of 147,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.