| Title |
Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000515.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mandy D Müller, Philippe Lyrer, Martin M Brown, Leo H Bonati |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 22% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Argentina | 2 | 11% |
| Egypt | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 234 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 6% |
| Researcher | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 104 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 117 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,518,260
of 23,905,640 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,240
of 12,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,388
of 362,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,905,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.