↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
Title
Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000515.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mandy D Müller, Philippe Lyrer, Martin M Brown, Leo H Bonati

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 267 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 14%
Student > Master 21 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 7%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Other 14 5%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 123 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Neuroscience 11 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Psychology 4 1%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 136 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,807,746
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,519
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,930
of 383,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#78
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.