Report for: Early routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategy versus early conservative management strategy in acute gallstone pancreatitis

Title	Early routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategy versus early conservative management strategy in acute gallstone pancreatitis
Published in	Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI	10.1002/14651858.cd009779.pub2
Pubmed ID	22592743
Authors	Frances Tse, Yuhong Yuan
Abstract	The role and timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in acute gallstone pancreatitis remains controversial. A number of clinical trials and meta-analyses have provided conflicting evidence.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Netherlands	2	50%
Ecuador	1	25%
Canada	1	25%

Demographic breakdown

Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	4	100%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Brazil	2	<1%
Chile	1	<1%
Ecuador	1	<1%
Portugal	1	<1%
South Africa	1	<1%
India	1	<1%
United Kingdom	1	<1%
Spain	1	<1%
Unknown	299	97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Master	43	14%
Student > Postgraduate	35	11%
Student > Bachelor	30	10%
Researcher	29	9%
Other	24	8%
Other	77	25%
Unknown	70	23%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	155	50%
Nursing and Health Professions	17	6%
Social Sciences	8	3%
Psychology	8	3%
Unspecified	6	2%
Other	23	7%
Unknown	91	30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2019.

All research outputs

#2,217,051

of 22,665,794 outputs

Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#4,740

of 12,296 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#14,472

of 163,786 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#54

of 178 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategy versus early conservative management strategy in acute gallstone pancreatitis

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Twitter Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context