| Title |
Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013513.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lee-Yee Chong, Patorn Piromchai, Steve Sharp, Kornkiat Snidvongs, Carl Philpott, Claire Hopkins, Martin J Burton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 47% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 23% |
| Unknown | 44 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 38% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 48 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,322,058
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,726
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,566
of 386,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.