↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013513.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lee-Yee Chong, Patorn Piromchai, Steve Sharp, Kornkiat Snidvongs, Carl Philpott, Claire Hopkins, Martin J Burton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Other 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Professor 6 8%
Other 23 29%
Unknown 19 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 21 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,240,091
of 17,366,233 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,938
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,131
of 266,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,366,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.