↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013513.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lee-Yee Chong, Patorn Piromchai, Steve Sharp, Kornkiat Snidvongs, Carl Philpott, Claire Hopkins, Martin J Burton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Researcher 11 9%
Other 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 29 25%
Unknown 36 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 39 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,637,993
of 19,275,518 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,367
of 11,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,263
of 274,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,275,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.