↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for normal tension glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for normal tension glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002222.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Sycha, Clemens Vass, Oliver Findl, Peter Bauer, Ilse Groke, Leopold Schmetterer, Hans‐Georg Eichler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 10 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Computer Science 2 5%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,098,676
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,332
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,888
of 103,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.