↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for normal tension glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for normal tension glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002222.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Sycha, Clemens Vass, Oliver Findl, Peter Bauer, Ilse Groke, Leopold Schmetterer, Hans-Georg Eichler

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 20%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 8 27%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Computer Science 2 7%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2022.
All research outputs
#6,569,283
of 21,699,130 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,355
of 12,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,661
of 284,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,699,130 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.