↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Bladder training for urinary incontinence in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
259 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
Summary Policy documents Wikipedia Dimensions citations
Title
Bladder training for urinary incontinence in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001308.pub2
Pubmed ID
14973967
Authors

Sheila A Wallace, Brenda Roe, Kate Williams, Mary Palmer

Abstract

Urinary incontinence is a common and distressing problem. Bladder training aims to increase the interval between voids and is widely used for the treatment of urinary incontinence.

View on publisher site

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 180 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Master 22 12%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 48 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 21%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 58 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,599,491
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,904
of 12,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,068
of 135,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.