↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for dementia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle H Cameron, Edmund Lonergan, Helen Lee

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 160 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 18%
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 15%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 36 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 17%
Psychology 22 13%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 42 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,423,471
of 17,522,501 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,083
of 11,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,006
of 267,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,522,501 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.