↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
Title
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for dementia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle H Cameron, Edmund Lonergan, Helen Lee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 256 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 15%
Student > Bachelor 36 14%
Researcher 33 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 77 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 12%
Psychology 26 10%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 86 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,413,154
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,344
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,504
of 53,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.