↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
Title
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for dementia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle H Cameron, Edmund Lonergan, Helen Lee

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 264 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 15%
Student > Bachelor 37 14%
Researcher 33 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 81 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 13%
Psychology 26 10%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 91 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2024.
All research outputs
#5,054,728
of 26,430,863 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,235
of 13,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,777
of 53,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,430,863 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.