↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Low-fat diets for acquired hypercholesterolaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Low-fat diets for acquired hypercholesterolaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007957.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil A Smart, Belinda J Marshall, Maxine Daley, Elie Boulos, Janelle Windus, Nadine Baker, Nigel Kwok

Abstract

Hypercholesterolaemia, characterised by raised blood cholesterol levels, is not a disease itself but a metabolic derangement that often contributes to many diseases, notably cardiovascular disease. In most cases, elevated cholesterol levels are associated with high-fat diet, especially saturated fat, coupled with an inactive lifestyle. Less commonly, raised cholesterol may be related to an inherited disorder, familial hypercholesterolaemia. This systematic review is only concerned with acquired hypercholesterolaemia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 150 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 21%
Student > Master 27 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Researcher 14 9%
Other 7 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 35 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 47 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,528,720
of 21,148,463 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,209
of 12,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,150
of 142,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,148,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.