The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Low‐fat diets for acquired hypercholesterolaemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007957.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neil A Smart, Belinda J Marshall, Maxine Daley, Elie Boulos, Janelle Windus, Nadine Baker, Nigel Kwok |
| Abstract |
Hypercholesterolaemia, characterised by raised blood cholesterol levels, is not a disease itself but a metabolic derangement that often contributes to many diseases, notably cardiovascular disease. In most cases, elevated cholesterol levels are associated with high-fat diet, especially saturated fat, coupled with an inactive lifestyle. Less commonly, raised cholesterol may be related to an inherited disorder, familial hypercholesterolaemia. This systematic review is only concerned with acquired hypercholesterolaemia. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Algeria | 1 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
| South Africa | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 59 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 71 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,980,276
of 26,743,793 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,004
of 13,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,648
of 121,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,743,793 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.