↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Self-administered versus provider-administered medical abortion

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
32 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
Title
Self-administered versus provider-administered medical abortion
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013181.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine Gambir, Caron Kim, Kelly Ann Necastro, Bela Ganatra, Thoai D Ngo

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 189 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 73 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 85 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2023.
All research outputs
#890,839
of 24,185,663 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,852
of 12,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,446
of 366,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,185,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.