↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Long-acting beta2-agonists versus theophylline for maintenance treatment of asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Long-acting beta2-agonists versus theophylline for maintenance treatment of asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001281.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Augustine Tee, Mariko S Koh, Peter G Gibson, Toby J Lasserson, Amanda Wilson, Louis B Irving

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 93 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 26 26%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 16 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#5,608,116
of 17,360,236 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,107
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,187
of 272,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#138
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,360,236 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.