↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Occlusion for stimulus deprivation amblyopia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Occlusion for stimulus deprivation amblyopia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005136.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aileen Antonio-Santos, S Swaroop Vedula, Sarah R Hatt, Christine Powell

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 6 6%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 41 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Psychology 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Design 2 2%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 46 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,350,419
of 19,557,897 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,471
of 11,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,773
of 286,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,557,897 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.