↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Health workers’ perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
57 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1066 Mendeley
Title
Health workers’ perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011942.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Willem A Odendaal, Jocelyn Anstey Watkins, Natalie Leon, Jane Goudge, Frances Griffiths, Mark Tomlinson, Karen Daniels

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,066 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1066 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 114 11%
Researcher 88 8%
Student > Bachelor 82 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 7%
Other 34 3%
Other 156 15%
Unknown 515 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 162 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 117 11%
Social Sciences 61 6%
Psychology 35 3%
Computer Science 31 3%
Other 121 11%
Unknown 539 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#942,103
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,853
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,439
of 393,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.