The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Health workers’ perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011942.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Willem A Odendaal, Jocelyn Anstey Watkins, Natalie Leon, Jane Goudge, Frances Griffiths, Mark Tomlinson, Karen Daniels |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 7 | 15% |
| South Africa | 3 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 80% |
| Scientists | 5 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1163 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 117 | 10% |
| Researcher | 89 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 86 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 3% |
| Other | 190 | 16% |
| Unknown | 562 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 166 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 128 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 64 | 6% |
| Psychology | 36 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 35 | 3% |
| Other | 150 | 13% |
| Unknown | 584 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,133,755
of 26,540,415 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,127
of 13,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,870
of 397,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,540,415 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.