| Title |
Sustained versus standard inflations during neonatal resuscitation to prevent mortality and improve respiratory outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004953.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matteo Bruschettini, Colm PF O'Donnell, Peter G Davis, Colin J Morley, Lorenzo Moja, Maria Grazia Calevo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 18% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 76% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 189 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 12% |
| Researcher | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 84 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 95 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,453,420
of 23,199,478 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,105
of 12,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,855
of 367,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#81
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,199,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.