↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Sustained versus standard inflations during neonatal resuscitation to prevent mortality and improve respiratory outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Sustained versus standard inflations during neonatal resuscitation to prevent mortality and improve respiratory outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004953.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matteo Bruschettini, Colm PF O'Donnell, Peter G Davis, Colin J Morley, Lorenzo Moja, Maria Grazia Calevo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 17%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Master 8 10%
Unspecified 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 24 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Unspecified 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 28 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,034,062
of 18,203,001 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,634
of 11,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,414
of 281,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,203,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.