↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic impacted wisdom teeth

Overview of attention for article published in this source, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
34 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic impacted wisdom teeth
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003879.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mettes, Theodorus (Dirk) G, Ghaeminia, Hossein, Nienhuijs, Marloes EL, Perry, John, van der Sanden, Wil JM, Plasschaert, Alphons

Abstract

The prophylactic removal of asymptomatic impacted wisdom teeth is defined as the (surgical) removal of wisdom teeth in the absence of local disease. Impacted wisdom teeth may be associated with pathological changes, such as inflammation of the gums around the tooth, root resorption, gum and alveolar bone disease, damage to the adjacent teeth and the development of cysts and tumours. Other reasons to justify prophylactic removal have been to prevent late incisor crowding. When surgical removal is carried out in older patients, following the development of symptoms, the risk of postoperative complications, pain and discomfort increases. Nevertheless, in most developed countries prophylactic removal of trouble-free wisdom teeth, either impacted or fully erupted, has long been considered as 'appropriate care' and is a very common procedure. There is a need to determine whether there is evidence to support this practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 152 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 18%
Student > Bachelor 24 16%
Student > Postgraduate 17 11%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 35 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 41 27%