↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tianma Gouteng Yin Formula for treating primary hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Tianma Gouteng Yin Formula for treating primary hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008166.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong Wei Zhang, Juan Tong, Guangming Zhou, Haizhong Jia, Johnny Y Jiang

Abstract

Tianma Gouteng Yin Formula (TGYF) is widely used to treat hypertension-related symptoms in clinical practice in East Asia. It has been shown to have a blood pressure lowering effect, reducing total cholesterol, improving clinical symptoms and quality of life, and preventing the occurrence of stroke in hypertensive patients. Understanding the effect of Tianma Gouteng Yin Formula on blood pressure, quality of life and cardiovascular risk factors could be valuable for the management of high blood pressure.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hong Kong 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 20%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 13 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,520,250
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,117
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,128
of 167,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.