↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tianma Gouteng Yin Formula for treating primary hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Tianma Gouteng Yin Formula for treating primary hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008166.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong Wei Zhang, Juan Tong, Guangming Zhou, Haizhong Jia, Johnny Y Jiang

Abstract

Tianma Gouteng Yin Formula (TGYF) is widely used to treat hypertension-related symptoms in clinical practice in East Asia. It has been shown to have a blood pressure lowering effect, reducing total cholesterol, improving clinical symptoms and quality of life, and preventing the occurrence of stroke in hypertensive patients. Understanding the effect of Tianma Gouteng Yin Formula on blood pressure, quality of life and cardiovascular risk factors could be valuable for the management of high blood pressure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hong Kong 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 19%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Professor 4 6%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,966,223
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,559
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,895
of 181,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.