↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Audit filters for improving processes of care and clinical outcomes in trauma systems

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Audit filters for improving processes of care and clinical outcomes in trauma systems
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007590.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Evans, Daniel Howes, William Pickett, Luigi Dagnone

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 150 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 20%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 34 22%
Unknown 27 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Psychology 7 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 38 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#4,469,140
of 14,577,254 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,437
of 11,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,534
of 129,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,577,254 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.