↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Second trimester serum tests for Down's Syndrome screening

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Second trimester serum tests for Down's Syndrome screening
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009925
Pubmed ID
Authors

S Kate Alldred, Jonathan J Deeks, Boliang Guo, James P Neilson, Zarko Alfirevic

Abstract

Down's syndrome occurs when a person has three copies of chromosome 21 - or the specific area of chromosome 21 implicated in causing Down's syndrome - rather than two. It is the commonest congenital cause of mental retardation. Noninvasive screening based on biochemical analysis of maternal serum or urine, or fetal ultrasound measurements, allows estimates of the risk of a pregnancy being affected and provides information to guide decisions about definitive testing.  

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 203 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 16%
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 66 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 8 4%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 76 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,246,238
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,070
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,475
of 167,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.