| Title |
Hypnosis during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postnatal period for preventing postnatal depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009062.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mitsuhiro Sado, Erika Ota, Andrew Stickley, Rintaro Mori |
| Abstract |
The morbidity caused by postnatal depression is enormous. Several psychological or psychosocial interventions have appeared to be effective for treating the disorder although they have not shown a clear benefit in preventing the development of PND. As yet however, the effectiveness of hypnosis has not been evaluated in relation to this. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 67% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Malawi | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 265 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 8% |
| Researcher | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 60 | 22% |
| Unknown | 71 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 26% |
| Psychology | 46 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Unknown | 77 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#5,189,947
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,181
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,058
of 181,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.