RT @rt7683: @USMortality lack of diagnosis rofl you should be a comedian. The elimination of measles and efficacy of MMR is widely establis…
@msabouri @jimcoan @briebriejoy If you want ones looking at just RCTs here: https://t.co/FiTACzYfB0
@TomSiebert @Liberty_Briefs @mcuban @RobertKennedyJr @joerogan @thereal_truther @PeterHotez Nope. Cochrane review. https://t.co/17eR3vqcPG Of course now you'll say they are all paid shills, in on it, etc.
@sailendra76 @JulieSnark @WarClandestine Here’s a gold-standard Cochrane review of the evidence on the measles, mumps and rubella vaccines. It’s quite easy to take other factors known to reduce the incidence of these diseases, and then do the arithmetic. E
RT @FredBeamer3: @Christi98790775 @stkirsch Cat did not sell any products. She represented the scientific method that is based on logical r…
@Christi98790775 @stkirsch Cat did not sell any products. She represented the scientific method that is based on logical reasoning and evidence. https://t.co/3WROEGnXG7
Solanar is providing a fantastic example of how junk medical science has become. A series of tweets linking studies that actually prove nothing and are full of conflicts of interests. Yet, it's a scientific study that's been "peer reviewed" making you ques
RT @MsAmitripped: @stkirsch That's not what the systemic review of over TWENTY-THREE MILLION PEOPLE ACROSS FIFTY-FOUR YEARS shows, Kirsch!…
@AblemanAdam @antiwarjosh @Little_Red_Sun @ComptonMadeMe What a mug, do you want to buy a bridge? it has towers and everything! https://t.co/tyfLf47W95
RT @MsAmitripped: @stkirsch That's not what the systemic review of over TWENTY-THREE MILLION PEOPLE ACROSS FIFTY-FOUR YEARS shows, Kirsch!…
RT @MsAmitripped: @stkirsch Hi Steve, you never actually explained why a systematic review which goes BEYOND your criteria (by a huge margi…
RT @MsAmitripped: @DiegoCryptodona @stkirsch Oh, but it does. In the form of a systematic review of all the studies! https://t.co/2P421JTx…
@stkirsch "Just show me ONE study that doesn't match the criteria of the studies included in the multiple meta-analyses covering many millions of cases that show no association between vaccines and autism." https://t.co/jUJC5e3vJk https://t.co/BFXiDwdvXL
RT @MsAmitripped: @stkirsch Hi Steve, you never actually explained why a systematic review which goes BEYOND your criteria (by a huge margi…
RT @balkraix: @stkirsch @yairlv Also, why don't just look at the conclusion of the systematic review and meta-analisis? EJ: 1-https://t.co…
@stkirsch @yairlv Also, why don't just look at the conclusion of the systematic review and meta-analisis? EJ: 1-https://t.co/nsvYSBUcJi 2-https://t.co/s6OLartqwC 3-https://t.co/UJGNMQtG32 4-https://t.co/pyjsty531T 5-https://t.co/ehkFcU30gB 6-https://t.co/
RT @MsAmitripped: @DiegoCryptodona @stkirsch Oh, but it does. In the form of a systematic review of all the studies! https://t.co/2P421JTx…
@PeaceLillie33 @katielitter1 @ValZimmer2 @jathorpmfm You lied again. There are many such studies. https://t.co/ys1gsrUTmq
@Tripple_Delta @YungFierens @SteviesQuotes https://t.co/3XeMhFGIrg Ik kan bijvoorbeeld wel een studie voorleggen over de werking en veiligheid van MBR vaccinatie (die bij ons standaard in het vaccinatieschema zit). Dit is natuurlijke en wetenschappelijke
@SteviesQuotes @Tripple_Delta https://t.co/3XeMhFGIrg Ik kan bijvoorbeeld wel een studie voorleggen over de werking en veiligheid van MBR vaccinatie (die bij ons standaard in het vaccinatieschema zit). Dit is natuurlijke en wetenschappelijke meta-analyse,
@rodriseiandrea @ataraxia1990 @CancerIntegral Revisión Cochrane de la triple vírica con 51 ensayos clínicos y más de 23 millones de participantes con más de 10 millones de niños.. En fin https://t.co/pwDbNWse6d Hágase un favor y no haga más el ridículo P
@freedomlover108 @paraicotoole @Neil4N No evidence for a link between MMR and cronh's disease: 1-https://t.co/oZVrqqr5Yf 2-https://t.co/ACWVThGpcr 3-https://t.co/wCODKd7dGn No evidence for a link for autism: https://t.co/vKebF5ijyQ And it seems like th
@hirshdeborah1 @Spectrum They don't mention it because it has been found that vaccines do not cause autism https://t.co/viDKqzTmny , https://t.co/HK2Dw2oDxv . This is old news. Scientists are looking for the real causes of autism.
@Hamfists48 @stkirsch Who or what is they? https://t.co/Epr0r4e4sL https://t.co/FuJYQVkhXD.
@vizzaye @Spectrum No they don't. Please stop spreading misinformation. https://t.co/viDKqzTmny
@CatherineSBoyle @ScienceWDrDoug Fractivac and Quintovirelon (you got one of them) weren't good vaccines. But they didn't created "ADE". They had nothing to do with mRNA vaccines. See: 1) https://t.co/ULE2E8GRw8 2) https://t.co/EV5Yv8aT6j 2/2
@matthewshaw1111 @Medical_Nemesis @LMHAMW @_sermons I don't think that's right: there were further studies. You're of course free to go through the Cochrane review and all the studies it used. https://t.co/MbVbbWZf9p
@norman_pilon @zdzichudyrma @AlastairMcA30 @DrLoupis If by more serious complications you mean “ever getting infected” or “being able to transmit it to others”, sure. Whether dimeric sIgA is actively produced during vaccination is less critical than whethe
@Pawe66860310 @MichaWojtcz https://t.co/bpcEm7NPKZ omówione w tym artykule: https://t.co/xYAA36DnfK
@medinc_ ... 1) Cuando se habla de la efectividad de una vacuna, ¿a qué se refiere?, ¿RRR o RRA?, porque la efectividad de un tratamiento lo marca el RRA (supongo que estaremos de acuerdo) Veamos la del sarampión: https://t.co/PvTppecVlm ...
Le #vaccin contre la rougeole, les oreillons, la rubéole et la varicelle (RORV) protège-t-il les enfants et a-t-il des effets néfastes ? https://t.co/cwaxF6CLB8
@GlowyShrimp Ce n’est PAS un vaccin obligatoire, mais je trouve dommage de ne pas le proposer aux parents pour leurs bébés. Double avantage : pas de varicelle chez les gosses, et pas de zona plus tard. Pour le vaccin RORV proposé aux US, je te joins la rev
@farmaceuticoac1 @CarlosPeart1 @DioMar1181 @Paolo8200 @_Yitz_ @b_baruj @elperrodelalask @JessLedezma26 @Anthony04676 @McBibe @FarsaPandemia @mariaepty @PapanataEl @GiuseppeNoc @ChrisjamesD @chupayolvida1 @Chanabassarah Sarampión: 95-96% Paperas: 72-86% Ru
@HolliLama @TheJniac @mondtmarjan @WHO One example. https://t.co/nIJwooZCmv
@matthewdmarsden @LozzaFox Its here for you: You will gain more from reading the research which has more detail MMR: https://t.co/0aTrKffEED Pertussis: https://t.co/vqhTiCt1oG Polio: https://t.co/Gr1iZ2ajfU.
@Manu_Nr1 @fisnikzyberi @hardmanpolitics @alain_berset replizieren. Hier bspw. eine Review zur MMR: https://t.co/abzbWOWAAl
@markgroup1 @LEPUYANA La historia de las vacunas, de la inmunización, de la efectividad, no es reciente. https://t.co/6A8BljQAVM
@adacebur @rinavivi influenza no es de 100% https://t.co/NYmZG7u9cx . sarampión no es 100% https://t.co/AwTgSRZRyX. Pero no importa, total vas a decir que todo es pagado, así que no tiene sentido
@JasonBr15039189 @AndySimo8 @EricRWeinstein From his patent application for a measles vacc (a blatant conflict of interest!): "...use of the MMR vaccine ... results in ... disorder including autism (RBD)..." And all these metaanalyses say otherwise: https:
@TripleAries328 @Matthew4300 @Abettervision Your being too lazy to look for yourself doesn’t mean we have to do the work for you. But, hey, here’s a freebie: safety study on the MMR vaccine. https://t.co/icwI9PDpej
@tilo_sauer @abimelex @MDRAktuell Denunziant? Wo steht das denn in meiner Bio? https://t.co/R9mUXf9YU5 Masern schützt nur vor Ausbruch, nicht vor Ansteckung... Naja egal. Wir haben unsere Meinungen. Gute Nacht.
Here’s a Cochrane review (meta-analysis of *dozens* of complied studies) providing evidence for safety/efficacy of the MMR vaccine - which is something you would miss out on if you took @LaserHodl’s advice. https://t.co/EQdrCYUuZu
@SGBarbour Zero control studies done?…I don’t think that’s right. Taking just the MMR vaccine, there is a an updated Cochrane review (meta-analysis of *dozens* of studies, including RCTs) from just last year showing efficacy: https://t.co/EQdrCYUuZu
@Khaos17022448 @vsiobudethoroso @elazotedelnom Tienes menos luces que un apagón. https://t.co/9xXn7kE1fn https://t.co/mEcE5Btwyy
@DubraCapital Sorry, ITP post-MMR is 1 in 40K (source here: https://t.co/LLj2MWOOse) https://t.co/ffCUAGhfxR
@ChrisMasterjohn @AviBittMD I can't help but sigh though, you are a smart guy Chris, and know how to comb through the literature, no? It's not hard to find all of the studies disproving this connection. Another more recent example https://t.co/vjNKJqQUPE
@ExposingMiLabs @doritmi @tenebra99 @Cait_Esq Cochrane Review covering 23 million kids. https://t.co/du4n1b7rWr
@AliCocco11 @StarDust240781 @19CherryB97 auch bei masern gibt es keine 100% impfschutz... https://t.co/5yRoGx952y https://t.co/VTzFu9gTBP
Revue Cochrane 2020 sur ROR https://t.co/HDVWGwZU0h
Y la segunda revision? https://t.co/XAOT89BXwt Esta no hace ni una mencion a las vacunas.... Por otro lado otras revisiones como la de cochrane concluyen que, a parte de ser seguras, no hay un incremento en el riesgo de autismo https://t.co/7pJoTo5oOX
@GrayLorian @Buenrollo13 Aquí tienes una revisión sistemática sobre sarampión, rubeola, parotiditis y varicela. https://t.co/S3Ni7lYwM6
@EnriqueRusArias @FLMIRONES Le dejo algunos estudios sobre esa vacuna (de esa forma puede ver que los datos reportados por los autores del paper son outliers) 1-https://t.co/0iMl7ipW3T 2-https://t.co/NUmESC53Jw 3-https://t.co/7pJoTo5oOX (esta es una revis
@Manu_Nr1 @fabiohasler_ Hier als Beispiel für die MMR-Impfung ein Review, dass die Ergebnisse verschiedener RCT-Studien auswertet: https://t.co/e7idv4xCOR Also alleine in diesem Review werden 9 RCT Studien untersucht...zu einer Impfung https://t.co/3omNkR1
@B_Rotcod @timruss2 Where to start. Autism and Crohn's disease link to MMR vaccines has been repeatedly refuted by studies published by the Cochrane Medical Library and the Statens Serum Institut these from 2019 https://t.co/JSiRORNJGf https://t.co/BN6lc
@hermann_hanna @Mi50021220 @DrPuerner Es gibt bei jeder Impfung Impfdurchbrüche. Bei Corona Alpha ist diese Rate sehr gering (~5%). Leider ist Sie bei Delta ein gutes Stück höher aber immer noch ziemlich gering. Zusammen mit Masken ist das Infektionsrisiko
@PeterDusburg @Mi50021220 @DrPuerner Hier die wirkungsgrade typischer Impfungen: Masern: 95% Mumms: 86% Röteln: 89% Windpocken: 95% Corona Alpha: 95% Corona Delta: 67-88% https://t.co/GaPAB6c9PG
@30Talet @AgnesWold @fullsula @GlennGoyne @TitikaMari Här, en översikt från förra året https://t.co/RrAWT0NuAv
@MargauxKer @faitleffort @CheckNewsfr Aucun vaccin n'est efficace à 100%. A chaque fois il faut des rappels, parfois toute sa vie. Par exemple, vous parlez de celui pour la rougeole/rubeole/oreillons ? https://t.co/j4UoNxUHEr
@DrLeeJones See Cochrane 2020 on MMR: no data on spreading. https://t.co/Lgok7qdr5u https://t.co/xv2KolJQZ7
@NoRed10750542 Mire: Fuente: https://t.co/IjlOdQprFU https://t.co/Dd9jjwznFs
A esto me refiero (mirad las respuestas de arriba )https://t.co/P6TVlhXvz1
E naturalmente a revisão sistemática da BIblioteca Cochrane: https://t.co/wDL6Ca6Dqg - que conclui não haver evidência de associação com autismo e com qualquer das doenças ou condições citadas pela dotôra.
@thelawofaverage Does this one? https://t.co/2zQeZI8ZFs
@SusanLFleming2 @Lizzy_Lang7 Are you sure they don't continue to monitor the long-term safety / efficacy of vaccines? Really sure? https://t.co/ST3b1GqfPj
RT @zynpokmen: Linkleri bırakıyorum :) Bunlar haricinde ayrıca yeni sorular olursa tekrar cevaplamaya çalışırım.. Kaynaklar: 1- https:/…
RT @zynpokmen: Linkleri bırakıyorum :) Bunlar haricinde ayrıca yeni sorular olursa tekrar cevaplamaya çalışırım.. Kaynaklar: 1- https:/…
RT @zynpokmen: Linkleri bırakıyorum :) Bunlar haricinde ayrıca yeni sorular olursa tekrar cevaplamaya çalışırım.. Kaynaklar: 1- https:/…
RT @zynpokmen: Linkleri bırakıyorum :) Bunlar haricinde ayrıca yeni sorular olursa tekrar cevaplamaya çalışırım.. Kaynaklar: 1- https:/…
RT @zynpokmen: Linkleri bırakıyorum :) Bunlar haricinde ayrıca yeni sorular olursa tekrar cevaplamaya çalışırım.. Kaynaklar: 1- https:/…
RT @zynpokmen: Linkleri bırakıyorum :) Bunlar haricinde ayrıca yeni sorular olursa tekrar cevaplamaya çalışırım.. Kaynaklar: 1- https:/…
Linkleri bırakıyorum :) Bunlar haricinde ayrıca yeni sorular olursa tekrar cevaplamaya çalışırım.. Kaynaklar: 1- https://t.co/VtFARSGkJd 2- https://t.co/jP63UNeA8n 3- https://t.co/dED7k8Ezor
RT @io302: はしか・風疹・水ぼうそう・おたふく風邪ワクチンの安全性・有効性に関するコクランレビュー。2300万以上の小児で138件の研究報告からまとめ。 自閉症に関しても接種で『増えない』と。『個人の感想』レベルの『ワクチンで自閉症ガー』とは大きく異なる。 htt…
@SmaginaKatya2 @Zoinen @MZKgMpa6md7jGEs @max_katz А такие исследования есть. Пожалуйста, сводный анализ 138 исследований, включающих в себя более 23 миллионов детей. Там и кривой перевод на русский есть, но лучше в оригинале читать, конечно. https://t.co/
@teomerc @AurelianoStingi @CrossWordsCW Questa review aggiornata (per un totale di più di 20mio persone osservate) su vaccino trivalente e non solo è un buon esempio. Come dicevamo, c'è solo qualche associazione rarissima con alcuni effetti collaterali. Nu
@ChristineGahery @les_vaxxeuses @PatrickGrande17 @ArianeWalter Il y en a plusieurs bien sûr, en voici une : https://t.co/ZRVkI8WNa5 Elle ne trouve pas 97 mais 95% "L'efficacité du vaccin dans la prévention de la rougeole était de 95% après une dose (risque
There is evidence supporting an association between aseptic meningitis and MMR vaccines containing Urabe and Leningrad‐Zagreb mumps strains. https://t.co/9tnuM9ffS2
@ShelaghFogarty @LBC https://t.co/LBG5mqUGx8 Overall, the studies found that MMR, MMRV and MMR+V vaccines did not cause autism (2 studies 1,194,764 children), encephalitis (2 studies 1,071,088 children) or any other suspected unwanted effect.
@nanacate17 Just read this and stop being an idiot. https://t.co/LBG5mqUGx8
@yassb8 @3dMachaon @forceusee @_Carlrpn @Mediavenir Tiens lis ca le genie https://t.co/BGtizBKl4C
@spreeblick @elemob_de Etwas spät, aber von Cochrane: https://t.co/2UElk0UFoz
@Sc0ttJenkins @Ellif_DWulfe @AndreaEleanorF1 @HighWireTalk A recent systematic review by the Cochrane Institute: f 87 published studies, 13,232,509 children looking at various harms. Cochrane is independent and does not accept commercial or conflicted fund
@itsjillgardner @kytka9 @BreesAnna https://t.co/e4eI4gUWtD Cochrane reviews are the scientific gold standard for evidence based medicine. If ever you want to know if something has evidence of a high quality that it works, or not, just go to https://t.co/WG
RT @balkraix: Revisión sobre la efectividad de las vacunas ( 138 estudios con una muestra de 23,480,668 participantes). A parte de determ…
@LamujerdelaolaC Y no entiendo porque usted omite la evidencia mas reciente sobre la efectividad de estas y sobre que estas son seguras Y sobre todo: NO CAUSAN AUTISMO https://t.co/OaLaYAkuqr