”However, it is uncertain whether presenting RRR is likely to help people make decisions most consistent with their own values and, in fact, it could lead to misinterpretation.” https://t.co/9RYkYsJlvF
@TheSGEM @5_utr @f2harrell @SZehtabchi @drjohnm @VPrasadMDMPH @First10EM @thenntgroup @ProfBEEM @BEEMcme @SAEMEBM We are looking at the evidence - Cochrane 2011: https://t.co/LeLMhfQ79s https://t.co/KM3qHRY4hZ
RT @EbmShibanyan: 回答を終えたかたは、こちらのコクランレビューを読むとより理解が深まると思います。それぞれの効果の表し方がもつ性質に、医療者も患者も、もっと自覚的であっていいと思います。 https://t.co/vwp8RWABbZ
RT @EbmShibanyan: 回答を終えたかたは、こちらのコクランレビューを読むとより理解が深まると思います。それぞれの効果の表し方がもつ性質に、医療者も患者も、もっと自覚的であっていいと思います。 https://t.co/vwp8RWABbZ
RT @EbmShibanyan: 回答を終えたかたは、こちらのコクランレビューを読むとより理解が深まると思います。それぞれの効果の表し方がもつ性質に、医療者も患者も、もっと自覚的であっていいと思います。 https://t.co/vwp8RWABbZ
RT @EbmShibanyan: 回答を終えたかたは、こちらのコクランレビューを読むとより理解が深まると思います。それぞれの効果の表し方がもつ性質に、医療者も患者も、もっと自覚的であっていいと思います。 https://t.co/vwp8RWABbZ
回答を終えたかたは、こちらのコクランレビューを読むとより理解が深まると思います。それぞれの効果の表し方がもつ性質に、医療者も患者も、もっと自覚的であっていいと思います。 https://t.co/vwp8RWABbZ
I thought I was done but wanted to point there are some good resources on this if you are interested. I need to do this better (use frequencies more often etc.)… https://t.co/y4MXAB2ck8 /fin
リスク減少を表す指標としてRRR, ARR, NNTの3つを比較したコクランレビューがある。 RRRは後者2つに比べ、リスク減少が大きく感じさせ、説得力があると受け止めさせる。 https://t.co/EfpBbK1sCU
RT @giovanni_ef: @Retlouping @RickCarlsson @kfjnordin @erikMeira @NeilOConnell @stevekamper1 These are very good points @Retlouping, and I…
@Retlouping @RickCarlsson @kfjnordin @erikMeira @NeilOConnell @stevekamper1 These are very good points @Retlouping, and I think your interpretation is correct. Different formats of risk data are perceived differently and can be more or less persuasive. 👇
RT @NevalainenOlli: "Health professionals and consumers are prone to interpretations exerted by alternative statistical presentations of th…
RT @NevalainenOlli: "Health professionals and consumers are prone to interpretations exerted by alternative statistical presentations of th…
"Health professionals and consumers are prone to interpretations exerted by alternative statistical presentations of the same evidence" 1/x #NNT #EBM #Cochrane @markkumyllykan2 @KariTikkinen https://t.co/i8wZH3lwfT
Great read particularly for those in #publichealth
RT @Vilavaite: 'Mind Your “p”s, RRs, and NNTs: On Good #Statistics Behavior' vía @hswapnil https://t.co/CnBSvP5UjZ https://t.co/zRowwLxLZ0
RT @Vilavaite: 'Mind Your “p”s, RRs, and NNTs: On Good #Statistics Behavior' vía @hswapnil https://t.co/CnBSvP5UjZ https://t.co/zRowwLxLZ0
'Mind Your “p”s, RRs, and NNTs: On Good #Statistics Behavior' vía @hswapnil https://t.co/CnBSvP5UjZ https://t.co/zRowwLxLZ0
RT @hswapnil: @f2harrell @JAMA_current @RogerJLewis On its 'intuitive ease' its bizarre that JAMA allows them to make assertions when there…
@f2harrell @JAMA_current @RogerJLewis On its 'intuitive ease' its bizarre that JAMA allows them to make assertions when there are data suggesting its untrue. eg https://t.co/AKjzshHt94 (ARR preferred) or just read @hildabast coverage of the literature http
Problems with NNT - No error range, rounding, single time, combined outcomes, varies with baseline risk. Not always most appropriate! -Dr. Richards #EMConf #EBM #Cochrane https://t.co/n63GEDznuX
Medical studies. "presenting RRR .. could lead to misinterpretation" #Health #wellness #MedEd https://t.co/TyDg4t2kU5
RT @Students4BE: "The success of evidence-based practice depends on the clear and effective communication of statistical information" https…
RT @Students4BE: "The success of evidence-based practice depends on the clear and effective communication of statistical information" https…
RT @Students4BE: "The success of evidence-based practice depends on the clear and effective communication of statistical information" https…
RT @Students4BE: "The success of evidence-based practice depends on the clear and effective communication of statistical information" https…
RT @Students4BE: "The success of evidence-based practice depends on the clear and effective communication of statistical information" https…
RT @Students4BE: "The success of evidence-based practice depends on the clear and effective communication of statistical information" https…
"The success of evidence-based practice depends on the clear and effective communication of statistical information" https://t.co/wU6iRLV3UF
Natural frequencies are probably better understood than percentages in the context of diagnostic or screening tests. https://t.co/LrVzZCJjMp
talking to pts <140char: relative risk reduction (RRR), compared with absolute risk reduction (ARR) https://t.co/LrVzZCJjMp
RT @UnlockingBirth: @DrAliceRoberts all risks should be presented, but RRR not always understood 1/2 https://t.co/lQdSYjcvQM
@DrAliceRoberts all risks should be presented, but RRR not always understood 1/2 https://t.co/lQdSYjcvQM
My preference: natural frequency (but same issues than with #NNT) https://t.co/uDm3P58bMJ @stephensenn @McGillEBOH @robertwplatt
.@gesclinvarela las frecuencias naturales (pej 2 de cada 10) son las + inteligibles para expresar términos absolutos, http://t.co/7YNqXXVdPU
.@gesclinvarela las frecuencias naturales (pej 2 de cada 10) son las + inteligibles para expresar términos absolutos, http://t.co/7YNqXXVdPU
Comment on Akl EA (2011): Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions. http://t.co/iXmG2a9sK7
Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions http://t.co/BlclPupCjY
Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions http://t.co/BlclPupCjY
@afrakt Yes, I think the list I on understandability consider is pretty clear. Pls don't overlook the link to this: http://t.co/vgmIMT3DlM
.@Elie_Akl: your Cochrane review on communicating risks is great - comments for your updating @PubMedCommons http://t.co/vgmIMSM1Xc
.@Elie_Akl: your Cochrane review on communicating risks is great - comments for your updating @PubMedCommons http://t.co/vgmIMSM1Xc
Relative v absolute measures of effect influence treatment decisions. MDs no better than pts. HT @PaulGlasziou http://t.co/nr9Xve8lt6
MT @tlassers here's a #systematicreview of how to reduce the risk of docs being misled http://t.co/1hfyek5Gsi
#industryinNHS RT @tlassers ...& here's a #systematicreview of how to reduce the risk of docs being misled http://t.co/Xc203ai2TJ
@davidecarroll ...& here's a #systematicreview of how to reduce the risk of docs being misled http://t.co/Rhv0fUldia
@medskep @trishgreenhalgh #Cochrane reviews on message framing http://t.co/lByzJchX6T and stats formats http://t.co/GRZLqMiBda recommended
@realscientists agree :) @cochranecollab developed #systematicreview on this http://t.co/pdoHRnVupu journalist need read this stuff i guess
Natural frequencies > probabilities. Relative Risk Reduction more persuasive - good or bad thing? http://t.co/sQyACz3FuV
@drsimmo In the mean time the way people frame risks also matters. http://t.co/GszpKr5U
Using different statistical formats for presenting health information | Cochrane Summaries http://t.co/otijGzCW