↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions implemented through sporting organisations for increasing participation in sport

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions implemented through sporting organisations for increasing participation in sport
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004812.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naomi Priest, Rebecca Armstrong, Jodie Doyle, Elizabeth Waters

Abstract

There is now compelling scientific evidence that increased levels of physical activity can bring wide-ranging health benefits. These benefits can extend beyond physical health to include other positive impacts relating to mental health and personal development. The sport and recreation sector is viewed as a priority area for increasing rates of physical activity. Participation rates in organised sport have been shown to be lower in females and to decline with age, and are reduced in lower socio-economic and minority groups including people from non-English speaking and Indigenous backgrounds. It is important to determine the most effective interventions that sporting organisations can use to increase people's participation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 316 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 15%
Researcher 33 10%
Student > Bachelor 28 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 4%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 95 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 18%
Sports and Recreations 41 13%
Psychology 32 10%
Social Sciences 31 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 9%
Other 28 9%
Unknown 100 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,905,222
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,040
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,166
of 96,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.