↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transverse versus vertical groin incision for femoral artery approach

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Transverse versus vertical groin incision for femoral artery approach
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013153.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcus Canteras, Jose CC Baptista-Silva, Frederico do Carmo Novaes, Daniel G Cacione

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Postgraduate 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Other 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Engineering 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 21 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#10,953,147
of 18,468,417 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,686
of 11,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,139
of 287,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,468,417 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.