↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transverse versus vertical groin incision for femoral artery approach

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Transverse versus vertical groin incision for femoral artery approach
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013153.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcus Canteras, Jose Cc Baptista-Silva, Frederico do Carmo Novaes, Daniel G Cacione

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 8%
Other 10 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 66 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 32%
Unspecified 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 77 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#16,337,158
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,161
of 13,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,357
of 407,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#168
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.